Park Is No Place for Private Grief
(April 29) - Grief is a very personal burden. Some people carry it for a long time. Some need the help of family and friends to shoulder the load. The heaviest grief of all is the one following the death of a child. It is every parent’s worst nightmare and something that can never be put down.
The closest I ever came to this was 11 years ago last Sunday. My nephew Ruairi was beaten by leukemia when he was just 13 years old. Like his uncle, he was never in any danger of becoming an outstanding athlete. Also like his uncle, he wasn’t quite photogenic enough to get his picture on the cover of Rolling Stone. But he enjoyed life, and every one who knew him enjoyed his company. Rarely a week goes by without me remembering him and thinking of him. It’s a daily remembrance for his parents and sisters. Many families have felt a similar sadness.
You don’t get over the death of a child, and nor should you be expected to. Whether from a sudden fatality or a protracted illness, it is a violation of what should be the natural progression of life. We are supposed to go out in order of seniority. Sons and daughters are supposed to bury their parents. Parents are not supposed to bury their children.
I am thinking of this just now because of the proposal by the Lambden family to redevelop a quarter of St. George’s Park as a memorial to their son. Just over a year ago, in February 2007, 10-year old Nicholas Lambden was playing hockey there. He suffered a fatal injury when he was hit on the head by a puck.
It was such a rare event that it received national attention. Don Cherry spoke about it during an episode of Coach’s Corner. James Duthie spoke about it on TSN. A very tasteful memorial has been put in the park near where the accident occurred. An iron bench was installed with a plaque inviting skaters to sit and remember the lad while they tie their skates. It is nice. It is thoughtful. It is appropriate. If an extra memorial is felt to be needed, a tree planting would be suitable. Let a living organism take root and grow close to where the tragedy struck. There are memorial trees, with dedication plaques, in several city parks, including St. George’s.
The family’s proposal has been brought to the city’s Community Development Committee. Fifty-eight current, and two former, neighbourhood residents signed a letter to city council asking that it be turned down. I live a block from the park, but wasn’t one of the signatories. I would have been, had I been asked.
There is already an inappropriate memorial in the park. For over a year a large wooden cross has hung on the ball diamond fence. There are also two floral wreaths that are regularly renewed. It is a small shrine that does not belong in a public park. Religious symbolism should not be permitted on public property. I am surprised the city Parks and Recreation Department has tolerated this misuse of the park for as long as it has.
The redevelopment, if it is approved by Council, would remove the baseball diamond and replace it with a gazebo built on the spot where the accident happened.
Further into the park, parallel with the tennis courts, there will be a soccer field that could be converted to a skating rink in the winter. There would be bleachers along the fence line. There would be a second recreational rink in the winter. As a memorial it would be, as one of the neighbourhood people expressed it, “way over the top.”
The Lambdens say they will pay for the changes to the park. The additions won’t become the city’s responsibility until a year after they are built. This is all well and good, but it misses the point. This is about a bereaved family, not about money. Whether the parents are home builders or home cleaners, the principle is the same: public space should not be permanently taken over by private grief.
